• About
    • Our Team
    • Careers
    • Stories
  • Technology Transfer
    • Available Technologies
    • Innovators
      • Meet Our Innovators
      • Submit Disclosure
      • NAI Chapter
    • Startups
      • Meet Our Startups
    • Lab to Life
      • About Lab to Life
      • Lab to Life Process
      • Lab to Life Startups
      • Lab to Life Team
      • Lab to Life Contact
    • AI POC Grant Program
    • Workshops and Events
      • CSU Demo Day
    • FAQ
  • Real Estate Services
    • The Prospect
    • Maintenance Request Form
    • Commercial Leasing
  • Financing Program
  • Maxwell Ranch
  • Connect
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Submit Disclosure
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Careers
    • Stories
  • Technology Transfer
    • Available Technologies
    • Innovators
      • Meet Our Innovators
      • Submit Disclosure
      • NAI Chapter
    • Startups
      • Meet Our Startups
    • Lab to Life
      • About Lab to Life
      • Lab to Life Process
      • Lab to Life Startups
      • Lab to Life Team
      • Lab to Life Contact
    • AI POC Grant Program
    • Workshops and Events
      • CSU Demo Day
    • FAQ
  • Real Estate Services
    • The Prospect
    • Maintenance Request Form
    • Commercial Leasing
  • Financing Program
  • Maxwell Ranch
  • Connect
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Submit Disclosure

Soil Organic Matter Physical Fractionation Device

Automating Soil Separation by Density

At a Glance

Researchers at Colorado State University have developed a laboratory instrument able to perform soil organic matter (SOM) physical fractionation on several soil samples sequentially without stopping between samples. The instrument fully automates the process and only requires a user to load and unload samples. This instrument will significantly lower the cost and operator skill set requirement, while largely increasing throughput. The device will allow for larger scale adoption of soil analysis that is essential in fighting climate change across the globe.

Background

The world’s soils are increasingly recognized as a key battleground in the fight against climate change, nutrient pollution, and other pressing global challenges. Soils have the capacity to store vast amounts of soil organic matter (SOM), which aids in the provision of multiple ecosystem services and is widely recognized as a viable component of a diversified strategy to address the UN sustainability goals. Managing SOM stocks to effectively address global challenges requires a deep understanding of SOM formation, persistence, and function, which in turn requires separating SOM into a light and a dense fraction (POM and MAOM), see Figure 1.

Current laboratory methods used to perform SOM physical fractionation (separating a soil sample into light and dense fractions) is very labor-intensive, manual process that requires highly trained personnel, see Figure 2. Even with the use of skilled personnel, the procedure has a very low throughput with an estimated rate of 20 samples per week. Because of the low throughput and high labor cost associated with this process, analytical test facilities are reluctant to offer SOM physical fractionation.

Overview

The automated SOM physical fractionation device is designed to perform all the functions of the manual method automatically and to process multiple samples continuously without user interaction. The device contains a chain of sample holders that are fed through the SOM light fraction extractor station one at a time. Different filter cups are used for each sample to allow samples to be stored separately and eliminate the user interaction between extractions, See Figure 3.

The device has a full control system and user interface. The control system uses a combination of sensors to progress the sample chain from one sample to the next and locate each sample accurately within the extractor station. The user interface allows laboratory personnel to adjust certain parameters of operation prior to starting a cycle such as number of samples, volume of rinse water used, etc.

Figure 1. Overview of key differences between particulate (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM), including dominant formation pathways. Fragmentation and translocation of structural litter residues primarily form POM, while direct association (ex vivo) or microbe-mediated transformation and deposition (in vivo) of soluble and low molecular weight litter or exudate compounds primarily form MAOM. Compared to POM, MAOM tends to last longer in soil, has a higher density (when including the minerals it is associated with), contains less chemically complex compounds on average, and has a lower carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio.
Figure 2. Demonstrations of fractionation techniques and examples of equipment used. (A) Aspiration of the light fraction floated in SPT using vacuum filtration. (B) Transfer of light fraction from nylon filter to pre-weighed pan. (C) Wet sieving to separate MAOM from hcOM (combined fractionation) or POM (size fractionation). (D) Back washing of hcOM (combined fractionation) or POM (size fractionation) fraction into pre-weighed pans from after completion of sieving.
Figure 3. (a) The SOM fractionation device prototype in the Soil Innovation Lab , lovingly named “FRAN”. (b) Close up of sample cup.

Benefits

  • Designed to perform every function of the manual SOM physical fraction method.
  • Can process up to 20 samples continuously in current configuration.
  • User interface allows lab personnel to adjust various parameters of operation.
  • More compact iterations with higher throughput are contemplated.

Applications

  • Automate process so different soil analyses can be performed on the products.
  • Soil Science Research Laboratories.
  • Federal laboratories.
  • Soil Testing Laboratories.

Publications

F. Cotrufo, et al (2022) “Soil organic matter formation, persistence, and functioning: A synthesis of current understanding to inform its conservation and regeneration.” Advances in Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.11.002

F. Cotrufo, et al (2015) “Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss.” Nature Geoscience. https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2520

S. Leuthold, et al (2022) “Physical fractionation techniques.” Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822974-3.00067-7

Last Updated: October 2023
Opportunity

Available for Licensing
TRL: 6

IP Status

US Patent 18/094,254

Inventors

Maria Francesca Cotrufo
Michelle Haddix
Rebecca Even

Reference Number
2021-001
Licensing Manager

Jessy McGowan
Jessy.McGowan@colostate.edu
970-491-7100

Contact Us About this Technology
Download PDF
Download
Strata logo white
  • Technology Transfer
  • Real Estate Services
  • Financing Program
  • Maxwell Ranch
  • Connect
  • Equal Opportunity Employer
  • Tax Information
  • Technology Transfer
  • Real Estate Services
  • Financing Program
  • Maxwell Ranch
  • Connect
  • Equal Opportunity Employer
  • Tax Information
Serving the Colorado State University System with strategic real estate services, intellectual property protection and licensing, and financing activities.
Integrity
Reliability
Respect
Innovation
Excellence
Submit Disclosure

Newsletter Sign Up

Connect